Comments on: Column 9: On legitimate authority on Conservapedia http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/ Working for transparency and accountability on Conservapedia Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:10:52 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Column 13: 1934, Revisited « The Conservapedia Column http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-719 Column 13: 1934, Revisited « The Conservapedia Column Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:54:20 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-719 [...] this subject has already been discussed in a Column. As has pointed out back in Column 9: On Legitimate Authority, authority on Conservapedia has never been based on the legal rules. Rather, it is based in a [...] [...] this subject has already been discussed in a Column. As has pointed out back in Column 9: On Legitimate Authority, authority on Conservapedia has never been based on the legal rules. Rather, it is based in a [...]

]]> By: Todd Larason http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-652 Todd Larason Sat, 26 May 2007 03:25:43 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-652 Have you all seen [[Youtube:Roy Zimmerman]]? He's the closest I've seen in a long time to Lehrer's humor ans sensibility. Have you all seen [[Youtube:Roy Zimmerman]]? He’s the closest I’ve seen in a long time to Lehrer’s humor ans sensibility.

]]> By: Kelseigh http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-651 Kelseigh Sat, 26 May 2007 02:10:45 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-651 The breakfast garbage you dump into the bay They drink at lunch in San Jose! The breakfast garbage you dump into the bay
They drink at lunch in San Jose!

]]> By: Todd Larason http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-650 Todd Larason Sat, 26 May 2007 00:22:38 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-650 hot and cold running crud! hot and cold running crud!

]]> By: lanfranc http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-649 lanfranc Fri, 25 May 2007 21:33:08 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-649 And don't breathe the air. And don’t breathe the air.

]]> By: Kelseigh http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-648 Kelseigh Fri, 25 May 2007 20:44:49 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-648 ...don't drink the water. …don’t drink the water.

]]> By: human http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-640 human Thu, 24 May 2007 23:05:25 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-640 I meant, duh, why *not* come join us. The water's fine... I meant, duh, why *not* come join us.

The water’s fine…

]]> By: human http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-638 human Thu, 24 May 2007 05:27:23 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-638 Geo.plrd, why come join us? The site only gets broken for brief moments while the crack admins make stuff work better. We have pizza :) Geo.plrd, why come join us? The site only gets broken for brief moments while the crack admins make stuff work better. We have pizza :)

]]> By: Linus http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-612 Linus Wed, 23 May 2007 01:50:35 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-612 On the subject of "cyberterrorism": If I was so inclined, I could hypothetically run, say, <code>rm -rf</code> on the CP server, and totally destroy the site. However, this does not qualify as <a>cyberterrorism</a>. If one cracked into American Airlines, and crashed a plane, <i>that</i> would be cyberterrorism. If one directed the Pentagon to attack Vermont, via cracking, that would be cyberterrorism. Cracking in and of itself, even black-hat cracking, is most certainly <i>not</i> cyberterrorism. I don't know where you guys got the idea that it was. Please don't try to feed us the "FBI said it was" rubbish. On the subject of “cyberterrorism”:

If I was so inclined, I could hypothetically run, say, rm -rf on the CP server, and totally destroy the site. However, this does not qualify as cyberterrorism. If one cracked into American Airlines, and crashed a plane, that would be cyberterrorism. If one directed the Pentagon to attack Vermont, via cracking, that would be cyberterrorism. Cracking in and of itself, even black-hat cracking, is most certainly not cyberterrorism. I don’t know where you guys got the idea that it was. Please don’t try to feed us the “FBI said it was” rubbish.

]]> By: Wikinterpreter http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-586 Wikinterpreter Tue, 22 May 2007 14:25:58 +0000 http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/column-9-on-legitimate-authority-on-conservapedia/#comment-586 It's great that they're reading this. Shows they're concerned. Oh, and thanks to everyone for noting the 'legit' bit. I nearly clicked send, but I thought that I might as well give myself a bit of protection. It’s great that they’re reading this. Shows they’re concerned. Oh, and thanks to everyone for noting the ‘legit’ bit. I nearly clicked send, but I thought that I might as well give myself a bit of protection.

]]>