<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: En Passant: Baraminology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/</link>
	<description>Working for transparency and accountability on Conservapedia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What is Baraminology? &#171; WhiteCoatUnderground</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Baraminology? &#171; WhiteCoatUnderground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>[...] Conservapedia , fundamentalism&#160;  Well, even those who believe in it are not that clear.  Baraminology is a classification system for living organisms based on Creation Theology rather than biology.  It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conservapedia , fundamentalism&nbsp;  Well, even those who believe in it are not that clear.  Baraminology is a classification system for living organisms based on Creation Theology rather than biology.  It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>human</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>&quot;By the way, how much press has RationalWiki gotten? I just spoke to a LA Times reporter about Conservapedia.&quot;

Interestingly enough, now that the article is out, RW is in it.  OK, tarred as &quot;vandals&quot;, but the url is out there.  Not bad for a month on line.

Yeah, let&#039;s check back in a year - 12 mos. for RW, 19 or so for CP, fair enough for me.  It will be interesting, to say the least.

You guys have a guy named &quot;TK&quot; too, don&#039;t you?  Did you give him balloons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;By the way, how much press has RationalWiki gotten? I just spoke to a LA Times reporter about Conservapedia.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, now that the article is out, RW is in it.  OK, tarred as &#8220;vandals&#8221;, but the url is out there.  Not bad for a month on line.</p>
<p>Yeah, let&#8217;s check back in a year &#8211; 12 mos. for RW, 19 or so for CP, fair enough for me.  It will be interesting, to say the least.</p>
<p>You guys have a guy named &#8220;TK&#8221; too, don&#8217;t you?  Did you give him balloons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baraminology Revisited &#171; The Conservapedia Column</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Baraminology Revisited &#171; The Conservapedia Column</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-984</guid>
		<description>[...] number 23 out of 15,800 on a Google search for &#8220;Baraminology&#8221;. Specifically, the post En Passant: Baraminology, which, if I may say so myself, is indeed a both well-researched and well-written post that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number 23 out of 15,800 on a Google search for &#8220;Baraminology&#8221;. Specifically, the post En Passant: Baraminology, which, if I may say so myself, is indeed a both well-researched and well-written post that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splodge</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Splodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>And every media story about Conservapedia has mocked it for the appalling quality of its articles.
And you can&#039;t even recognise this, given the number of times you link to them on your main pages.

You are a joke site and will remain so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And every media story about Conservapedia has mocked it for the appalling quality of its articles.<br />
And you can&#8217;t even recognise this, given the number of times you link to them on your main pages.</p>
<p>You are a joke site and will remain so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservative</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Rome wasn&#039;t built in day.  Internet traffic takes time to build.  Let me know if RationalWiki surpasses our ranking for this entry in 12 months which I think is a reasonable time frame considering how new Conservapedia is.  

By the way, how much press has RationalWiki gotten?  I just spoke to a LA Times reporter about Conservapedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rome wasn&#8217;t built in day.  Internet traffic takes time to build.  Let me know if RationalWiki surpasses our ranking for this entry in 12 months which I think is a reasonable time frame considering how new Conservapedia is.  </p>
<p>By the way, how much press has RationalWiki gotten?  I just spoke to a LA Times reporter about Conservapedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lanfranc</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>lanfranc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>And Wikipedia ranks as #1, I notice. Better keep working on those marketing efforts.

-AK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Wikipedia ranks as #1, I notice. Better keep working on those marketing efforts.</p>
<p>-AK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservative</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>You are just jealous because RationalWiki does not rank in the top 10 for Google rankings for Baraminology like Conservapedia does!  Please see: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Baraminology&amp;btnG=Google+Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are just jealous because RationalWiki does not rank in the top 10 for Google rankings for Baraminology like Conservapedia does!  Please see: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Baraminology&amp;btnG=Google+Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Baraminology&amp;btnG=Google+Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linus</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see my lovely lovely &lt;a href=&quot;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baraminology&amp;diff=190555&amp;oldid=189756&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;edit&lt;/a&gt;?

And they protected the article! Well well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see my lovely lovely <a href="http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baraminology&amp;diff=190555&amp;oldid=189756" rel="nofollow">edit</a>?</p>
<p>And they protected the article! Well well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palmd</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>palmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Wolfgang Pauli on reviewing a paper, &quot;This isn&#039;t right...it&#039;s not even wrong!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfgang Pauli on reviewing a paper, &#8220;This isn&#8217;t right&#8230;it&#8217;s not even wrong!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilbo</title>
		<link>http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>bilbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpcolumn.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/baraminology/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know if anyone noticed this cute little exchange between Andy and TK.

http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:DeborahB.#Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if anyone noticed this cute little exchange between Andy and TK.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:DeborahB.#Thanks" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:DeborahB.#Thanks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
